0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.06	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.16/0.47	% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
0.16/0.47	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.16/0.47	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.16/0.47	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.16/0.47	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.16/0.47	% CPULimit : 1440
0.16/0.47	% WCLimit  : 180
0.16/0.47	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 10:58:58 UTC 2026
0.16/0.48	% CPUTime  : 
0.16/0.48	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.22/0.57	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.22/0.59	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iWJbB9Hamc/E---3.1_2535924.p
7.51/2.00	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
7.51/2.00	% Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
7.51/2.00	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
7.51/2.00	% Starting full_lambda_6 with 540s (3) cores
7.51/2.00	% Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 180s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 180s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% lpo6_lambda_fix with pid 2535939 completed with status 0
7.51/2.00	% Result found by lpo6_lambda_fix
7.51/2.00	% Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
7.51/2.00	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
7.51/2.00	% Starting full_lambda_6 with 540s (3) cores
7.51/2.00	% Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = Auto)
7.51/2.00	% No SInE strategy applied
7.51/2.00	% Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
7.51/2.00	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
7.51/2.00	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2535944 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 19s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% lpo6_lambda_fix with pid 2535954 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting ehoh_best_sine with 17s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% ehoh_best_sine with pid 2535963 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 17s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with pid 2535967 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting sh2lt with 17s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% sh2lt with pid 2535970 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting sh2l with 17s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% sh2l with pid 2535973 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 76s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% ehoh_best6_lambda with pid 2535974 completed with status 0
7.51/2.00	% Result found by ehoh_best6_lambda
7.51/2.00	% Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
7.51/2.00	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
7.51/2.00	% Starting full_lambda_6 with 540s (3) cores
7.51/2.00	% Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = Auto)
7.51/2.00	% No SInE strategy applied
7.51/2.00	% Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
7.51/2.00	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
7.51/2.00	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% SubtermCWHack with pid 2535944 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 19s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% lpo6_lambda_fix with pid 2535954 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting ehoh_best_sine with 17s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% ehoh_best_sine with pid 2535963 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 17s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with pid 2535967 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting sh2lt with 17s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% sh2lt with pid 2535970 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting sh2l with 17s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% sh2l with pid 2535973 completed with status 10
7.51/2.00	% Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 76s (1) cores
7.51/2.00	% Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
7.51/2.00	% Presaturation interreduction done
7.51/2.00	
7.51/2.00	% Proof found!
7.51/2.00	% SZS status Theorem
7.51/2.00	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
7.51/2.00	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: ($o > $o) > ($o > $o) > $o).
7.51/2.00	thf(decl_24, type, epred2_0: ($o > $o) > $o).
7.51/2.00	thf(ramsey_u_2_4_4, conjecture, ![X1:($o > $o) > ($o > $o) > $o]:((![X2:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X3)=>(X1 @ X3 @ X2)))=>(?[X4:$o > $o, X5:$o > $o, X6:($o > $o) > $o]:((((X6 @ X4)&(X1 @ X5 @ X4))&~((X6 @ X5))))|?[X4:$o > $o, X5:$o > $o, X7:$o > $o, X8:$o > $o, X6:($o > $o) > $o, X9:($o > $o) > $o, X10:($o > $o) > $o]:(((((((((((((((((((X6 @ X4)&~((X6 @ X7)))&~((X6 @ X8)))&~((X9 @ X4)))&~((X9 @ X8)))&~((X10 @ X5)))&(X10 @ X7))&~((X10 @ X8)))&~((X1 @ X5 @ X4)))&~((X1 @ X7 @ X5)))&~((X1 @ X8 @ X4)))&~((X1 @ X8 @ X7)))&~((X1 @ X8 @ X5)))&~((X1 @ X7 @ X4)))&~((X10 @ X4)))&~((X9 @ X7)))&(X9 @ X5))&~((X6 @ X5))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.iWJbB9Hamc/E---3.1_2535924.p', ramsey_u_2_4_4)).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:($o > $o) > ($o > $o) > $o]:((![X2:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X3)=>(X1 @ X3 @ X2)))=>(?[X4:$o > $o, X5:$o > $o, X6:($o > $o) > $o]:((((X6 @ X4)&(X1 @ X5 @ X4))&~((X6 @ X5))))|?[X4:$o > $o, X5:$o > $o, X7:$o > $o, X8:$o > $o, X6:($o > $o) > $o, X9:($o > $o) > $o, X10:($o > $o) > $o]:(((((((((((((((((((X6 @ X4)&~((X6 @ X7)))&~((X6 @ X8)))&~((X9 @ X4)))&~((X9 @ X8)))&~((X10 @ X5)))&(X10 @ X7))&~((X10 @ X8)))&~((X1 @ X5 @ X4)))&~((X1 @ X7 @ X5)))&~((X1 @ X8 @ X4)))&~((X1 @ X8 @ X7)))&~((X1 @ X8 @ X5)))&~((X1 @ X7 @ X4)))&~((X10 @ X4)))&~((X9 @ X7)))&(X9 @ X5))&~((X6 @ X5)))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[ramsey_u_2_4_4])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X25:$o > $o, X26:$o > $o, X27:$o > $o, X28:$o > $o, X29:($o > $o) > $o, X30:$o > $o, X31:$o > $o, X32:$o > $o, X33:$o > $o, X34:($o > $o) > $o, X35:($o > $o) > $o, X36:($o > $o) > $o]:(((~(epred1_0 @ X25 @ X26)|(epred1_0 @ X26 @ X25))&((~(X29 @ X27)|~(epred1_0 @ X28 @ X27)|(X29 @ X28))&(~(X34 @ X30)|(X34 @ X32)|(X34 @ X33)|(X35 @ X30)|(X35 @ X33)|(X36 @ X31)|~(X36 @ X32)|(X36 @ X33)|(epred1_0 @ X31 @ X30)|(epred1_0 @ X32 @ X31)|(epred1_0 @ X33 @ X30)|(epred1_0 @ X33 @ X32)|(epred1_0 @ X33 @ X31)|(epred1_0 @ X32 @ X30)|(X36 @ X30)|(X35 @ X32)|~(X35 @ X31)|(X34 @ X31))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X4:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o, X6:($o > $o) > $o, X10:($o > $o) > $o, X9:($o > $o) > $o, X5:$o > $o]:(((X6 @ X3)|(X6 @ X4)|(X9 @ X2)|(X9 @ X4)|(X10 @ X5)|(X10 @ X4)|(epred1_0 @ X5 @ X2)|(epred1_0 @ X3 @ X5)|(epred1_0 @ X4 @ X2)|(epred1_0 @ X4 @ X3)|(epred1_0 @ X4 @ X5)|(epred1_0 @ X3 @ X2)|(X10 @ X2)|(X9 @ X3)|(X6 @ X5)|~((X6 @ X2))|~((X10 @ X3))|~((X9 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X6:($o > $o) > $o, X3:$o > $o, X2:$o > $o]:(((X6 @ X3)|~((X6 @ X2))|~((epred1_0 @ X3 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X37:$o > $o, X38:$o]:(((X37 @ ((epred2_0 @ X37)))|~((X37 @ ((X38)))))), inference(introduce_choice_axiom,[status(thm)],[])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o, X4:$o > $o, X10:($o > $o) > $o, X9:($o > $o) > $o, X6:($o > $o) > $o, X5:$o > $o]:(((X6 @ X2)|(X6 @ X3)|(X6 @ X4)|(X9 @ X5)|(X9 @ X2)|(X9 @ X3)|(X10 @ X5)|(X10 @ X3)|(X10 @ X4)|~((X10 @ X2))|~((X9 @ X4))|~((X6 @ X5)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4]), c_0_4]), c_0_4]), c_0_4]), c_0_4]), c_0_4])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X38:$o]:(((X2 @ ((epred2_0 @ X2)))|~((X2 @ ((X38)))))), inference(choice_inst,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X4:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o, X9:($o > $o) > $o, X6:($o > $o) > $o, X5:$o > $o, X2:$o > $o]:((((X2)=(X3))|((X4)=(X3))|((X5)=(X3))|(X6 @ X3)|(X6 @ X4)|(X6 @ X5)|(X9 @ X2)|(X9 @ X3)|(X9 @ X4)|~((X9 @ X5))|~((X6 @ X2)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_6])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X38:$o]:(((epred2_0 @ (^[Z0:$o]:((((Z0))=((X38))))))<=>(X38))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_7])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o, X6:($o > $o) > $o, X5:$o > $o, X4:$o > $o]:((((X2)=(X3))|((X4)=(X3))|((X3)=(X5))|((X2)=(X5))|((X4)=(X5))|(X6 @ X3)|(X6 @ X2)|(X6 @ X5)|~((X6 @ X4)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_8])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~((epred2_0 @ (^[Z0:$o]:(~((Z0)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$o > $o, X2:$o > $o, X4:$o > $o, X5:$o > $o]:((((X2)=(X3))|((X3)=(X4))|((X2)=(X4))|((X5)=(X4))|((X3)=(X5))|((X2)=(X5)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_10])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o, X4:$o > $o]:((((X2)=($not))|(($not)=(X3))|((X4)=(X3))|((X2)=(X3))|((X4)=(X2))|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o, X469:$o, X4:$o > $o]:((((X2 @ ((X469)))<=>~((X469)))|(($not)=(X3))|((X4)=(X2))|((X2)=(X3))|((X4)=(X3))|~((epred2_0 @ X4)))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X4:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o]:(((($not)=(X2))|((X3)=(X2))|((X4)=(X2))|((X3)=(X4))|(X4 @ (~($true)))|~((epred2_0 @ X3)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (epred2_0 @ (^[Z0:$o]:((Z0)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$o > $o, X2:$o > $o]:((((^[Z0:$o]:((Z0)))=(X2))|((^[Z0:$o]:((Z0)))=(X3))|(($not)=(X3))|((X2)=(X3))|(X2 @ (~($true))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X1039:$o, X3:$o > $o, X2:$o > $o]:(((($not)=(X3))|((^[Z0:$o]:((Z0)))=(X3))|((X1039)<=>(X2 @ ((X1039))))|((X2)=(X3))|(X2 @ (~($true))))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o]:((((^[Z0:$o]:((Z0)))=(X2))|(($not)=(X2))|((X3)=(X2))|(X3 @ (~($true)))|(X3 @ (($true))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o]:(((($not)=(X2))|((^[Z0:$o]:((Z0)))=(X2))|((X3)=(X2))|(X3 @ ((epred2_0 @ X3))))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_19]), c_0_7])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X1589:$o, X3:$o > $o]:(((($not)=(X2))|((X1589)<=>(X2 @ ((X1589))))|((X3)=(X2))|(X3 @ ((epred2_0 @ X3))))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$o > $o, X2:$o > $o]:(((($not)=(X2))|((X3)=(X2))|(X3 @ ((epred2_0 @ X3)))|~((X2 @ (~($true)))))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X1607:$o, X3:$o > $o, X2:$o > $o]:(((~((X1607))<=>(X2 @ ((X1607))))|((X3)=(X2))|(X3 @ ((epred2_0 @ X3)))|~((X2 @ (~($true)))))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X3:$o > $o]:((((X2)=(X3))|(X2 @ ((epred2_0 @ X2)))|~((X3 @ (($true))))|~((X3 @ (~($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$o > $o, X1644:$o, X3:$o > $o]:((((X2 @ ((X1644)))<=>(X3 @ ((X1644))))|(X2 @ ((epred2_0 @ X2)))|~((X3 @ (($true))))|~((X3 @ (~($true)))))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])).
7.51/2.00	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])])]), ['proof']).
7.51/2.00	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
7.51/2.00	% Parsed axioms                        : 1
7.51/2.00	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
7.51/2.00	% Initial clauses                      : 3
7.51/2.00	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
7.51/2.00	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
7.51/2.00	% Processed clauses                    : 769
7.51/2.00	% ...of these trivial                  : 19
7.51/2.00	% ...subsumed                          : 196
7.51/2.00	% ...remaining for further processing  : 553
7.51/2.00	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1592
7.51/2.00	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
7.51/2.00	% Backward-subsumed                    : 74
7.51/2.00	% Backward-rewritten                   : 0
7.51/2.00	% Generated clauses                    : 11835
7.51/2.00	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4367
7.51/2.00	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
7.51/2.00	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 16
7.51/2.00	% Paramodulations                      : 8654
7.51/2.00	% Factorizations                       : 463
7.51/2.00	% NegExts                              : 115
7.51/2.00	% Equation resolutions                 : 1592
7.51/2.00	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
7.51/2.00	% Total rewrite steps                  : 2938
7.51/2.00	% ...of those cached                   : 2937
7.51/2.00	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
7.51/2.00	%    Propositional check models        : 0
7.51/2.00	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
7.51/2.00	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
7.51/2.00	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
7.51/2.00	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
7.51/2.00	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
7.51/2.00	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
7.51/2.00	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
7.51/2.00	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
7.51/2.00	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
7.51/2.00	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
7.51/2.00	% Current number of processed clauses  : 156
7.51/2.00	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
7.51/2.00	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
7.51/2.00	%    Negative unit clauses             : 1
7.51/2.00	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 153
7.51/2.00	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3601
7.51/2.00	% ...number of literals in the above   : 30557
7.51/2.00	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
7.51/2.00	% Current number of archived clauses   : 398
7.51/2.00	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13278
7.51/2.00	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1267
7.51/2.00	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 285
7.51/2.00	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
7.51/2.00	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
7.51/2.00	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
7.51/2.00	% BW rewrite match successes           : 1
7.51/2.00	% Condensation attempts                : 0
7.51/2.00	% Condensation successes               : 0
7.51/2.00	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 461329
7.51/2.00	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 423
7.51/2.00	
7.51/2.00	% -------------------------------------------------
7.51/2.00	% User time                : 1.154 s
7.51/2.00	% System time              : 0.050 s
7.51/2.00	% Total time               : 1.204 s
7.51/2.00	% Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
7.51/2.00	
7.51/2.00	% -------------------------------------------------
7.51/2.00	% User time                : 1.156 s
7.51/2.00	% System time              : 0.057 s
7.51/2.00	% Total time               : 1.213 s
7.51/2.00	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
7.51/2.00	% E exiting
7.51/2.01	EOF